Advanced Synthetic Tests

Our benchmark suite includes a variety of tests that are less about replicating any real-world IO patterns, and more about exposing the inner workings of a drive with narrowly-focused tests. Many of these tests will show exaggerated differences between drives, and for the most part that should not be taken as a sign that one drive will be drastically faster for real-world usage. These tests are about satisfying curiosity, and are not good measures of overall drive performance. For more details, please see the overview of our 2021 Consumer SSD Benchmark Suite.

Whole-Drive Fill

Pass 1
Pass 2

The SLC write cache on the 2TB Inland Performance Plus lasts for about 225GB on first pass (about the same cache size as 980 PRO, but a bit faster), and about 55GB on the second pass when the drive is already full. Performance during each phase of filling the drive is quite consistent, with the only significant variability showing up after the drive is 80% full. Sequential write performance during the SLC cache phase is higher than any other drive we've tested to date.

Sustained 128kB Sequential Write (Power Efficiency)
Average Throughput for last 16 GB Overall Average Throughput

The post-cache performance is a bit slower than the fastest TLC drives, but overall average throughput is comparable to other top TLC drives. The Inland Performance Plus is still significantly slower than the MLC and Optane drives that didn't need a caching layer, but one or two more generational improvements in NAND performance may be enough to overcome that difference.

Working Set Size

As expected from a high-end drive with a full-sized DRAM buffer, the random read latency from the Inland Performance Plus is nearly constant regardless of the working set size. There's a slight drop in performance when random reads are covering the entire range of the drive, but it's smaller than the drop we see from drives that skimp on DRAM.

Performance vs Block Size

Random Read
Random Write
Sequential Read
Sequential Write

There are no big surprises from testing the Inland Performance Plus with varying block sizes. The Phison E18 controller has no problem handling block sizes smaller than 4kB. The random write results are a little rough especially when testing the drive at 80% full, but it's hardly the only drive to have SLC cache troubles here. Like many other drives, the sequential read performance doesn't scale smoothly with the larger block sizes, and the drive really needs a larger queue depth or very large block size to deliver great sequential read performance. 

Synthetic Tests: Basic IO Patterns Mixed IO Performance and Idle Power Management
Comments Locked

118 Comments

View All Comments

  • FunBunny2 - Saturday, May 15, 2021 - link

    "All of the synthetic tests in our SSD reviews are using Linux."

    I was specifically asking about user-space tests.
  • Billy Tallis - Saturday, May 15, 2021 - link

    > user-space

    No definition of that term that I'm aware of is relevant here. What did you mean?
  • FunBunny2 - Sunday, May 16, 2021 - link

    "What did you mean?"

    comment/question wasn't SSD specific, but testing regime generally.
  • Mdarrish - Friday, May 14, 2021 - link

    That is nonsense. I’ve replaced spinning disks with SSD’s and even SATA SSDs significantly speed up the performance.
  • GeoffreyA - Saturday, May 15, 2021 - link

    Big difference going from hard drive to ordinary SSD, especially booting.
  • pugster - Monday, May 17, 2021 - link

    Why is it Microsoft's fault? Magnetic hard drives will be used for at least a few more years because it is cheaper ssd's.
  • Spunjji - Thursday, May 13, 2021 - link

    High-performance SSDs just don't seem worth the extra cost for most of us. I'll be keeping an eye on how things develop with DirectStorage and the like, but for the time being I'm feeling happy enough even with my old Samsung PM951.
  • GeoffreyA - Thursday, May 13, 2021 - link

    Yes. Ordinary SSDs covered most of the ground, advancing from hard drives, and now the gains aren't doing much.
  • boozed - Thursday, May 13, 2021 - link

    The big advance for consumer applications was access time, everything else is just icing
  • mode_13h - Thursday, May 13, 2021 - link

    > High-performance SSDs just don't seem worth the extra cost for most of us.

    It depends on what you do.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now