Benchmarking Performance: CPU System Tests

Our first set of tests is our general system tests. These set of tests are meant to emulate more about what people usually do on a system, like opening large files or processing small stacks of data. This is a bit different to our office testing, which uses more industry standard benchmarks, and a few of the benchmarks here are relatively new and different.

All of our benchmark results can also be found in our benchmark engine, Bench.

FCAT Processing: link

One of the more interesting workloads that has crossed our desks in recent quarters is FCAT - the tool we use to measure stuttering in gaming due to dropped or runt frames. The FCAT process requires enabling a color-based overlay onto a game, recording the gameplay, and then parsing the video file through the analysis software. The software is mostly single-threaded, however because the video is basically in a raw format, the file size is large and requires moving a lot of data around. For our test, we take a 90-second clip of the Rise of the Tomb Raider benchmark running on a GTX 980 Ti at 1440p, which comes in around 21 GB, and measure the time it takes to process through the visual analysis tool.

System: FCAT Processing ROTR 1440p GTX980Ti Data

FCAT likes single threaded performance, whcih shows the high frequency parts with faster memory near the top.

Dolphin Benchmark: link

Many emulators are often bound by single thread CPU performance, and general reports tended to suggest that Haswell provided a significant boost to emulator performance. This benchmark runs a Wii program that ray traces a complex 3D scene inside the Dolphin Wii emulator. Performance on this benchmark is a good proxy of the speed of Dolphin CPU emulation, which is an intensive single core task using most aspects of a CPU. Results are given in minutes, where the Wii itself scores 17.53 minutes.

System: Dolphin 5.0 Render Test

Dolphin is also pure ST frequency driven, however a surprise twist in that our Xeon W-2155 beats the Core i7-8086K in this test, although with a margin of error. 

3D Movement Algorithm Test v2.1: link

This is the latest version of the self-penned 3DPM benchmark. The goal of 3DPM is to simulate semi-optimized scientific algorithms taken directly from my doctorate thesis. Version 2.1 improves over 2.0 by passing the main particle structs by reference rather than by value, and decreasing the amount of double->float->double recasts the compiler was adding in. It affords a ~25% speed-up over v2.0, which means new data.

System: 3D Particle Movement v2.1

3DPM likes fast cache and frequency, and the W-2195 is almost fighting with the Core i9-7980XE here, and is let down slightly by its slow memory. The 1950X is still top dog.

DigiCortex v1.20: link

Despite being a couple of years old, the DigiCortex software is a pet project for the visualization of neuron and synapse activity in the brain. The software comes with a variety of benchmark modes, and we take the small benchmark which runs a 32k neuron/1.8B synapse simulation. The results on the output are given as a fraction of whether the system can simulate in real-time, so anything above a value of one is suitable for real-time work. The benchmark offers a 'no firing synapse' mode, which in essence detects DRAM and bus speed, however we take the firing mode which adds CPU work with every firing.

System: DigiCortex 1.20 (32k Neuron, 1.8B Synapse)

DigiCortex is a memory focused benchmark, but can also take advantage of AVX2 and sometimes AVX512, hence why the W-2195 is sat at the top. That being said, it is above the i9-7980XE, despite the latter having dual AVX512 ports.

Agisoft Photoscan 1.3.3: link

Photoscan stays in our benchmark suite from the previous version, however now we are running on Windows 10 so features such as Speed Shift on the latest processors come into play. The concept of Photoscan is translating many 2D images into a 3D model - so the more detailed the images, and the more you have, the better the model. The algorithm has four stages, some single threaded and some multi-threaded, along with some cache/memory dependency in there as well. For some of the more variable threaded workload, features such as Speed Shift and XFR will be able to take advantage of CPU stalls or downtime, giving sizeable speedups on newer microarchitectures.

System: Agisoft Photoscan 1.3.3 (Large) Total Time

Agisoft is a mixture of workloads, although the big multithreaded bit in the middle tends to dominate. Both the W-2195 and W-2155 score the same time, with a cluster of results around it. The Core i9-7960X sits on top though, with a seemingly better mix of cores and threads.

Benchmarking Performance: CPU Office Tests Benchmarking Performance: CPU Rendering Tests
Comments Locked

74 Comments

View All Comments

  • Alsw - Monday, July 30, 2018 - link

    Nice article, unless i missed it it would be really handy to know all core Turbo boosts you acheived as i don't' think Intel release this info any more? i am in a situation where our FEA/CFD applications beneifit from both frequency and GHz so it is tricky, even before you start taking into acount whether dual CPU is better with the potential for performance variance data being passed between two physical CPU's
  • Ian Cutress - Monday, July 30, 2018 - link

    I thought I had the information, but I do not. I've reached out to Intel - normally the enterprise side of the business gives out this info, but the consumer side does not. I'll update the review when we get the details.
  • eek2121 - Monday, July 30, 2018 - link

    Looks like it's time to update your benchmark suite and redo benchmarks. Octane 2.0 has long since been retired, WebXPRT 15 as well. I like chrome, but you can disable updates in Firefox fairly easily. 7zip is at (!) 18.05. The version you are using is from 2010.
  • Ian Cutress - Monday, July 30, 2018 - link

    We've got a new benchmark suite for our next review, I put the finishing touches to it recently. The time we had these CPUs, it was not ready in time (also for retesting - a new suite takes about a month to bed in with older hardware).
  • HStewart - Monday, July 30, 2018 - link

    Ian, it would be really nice to see the performance benefits of AVX 512 in these benchmarks.

    I try to search for what applications are available that use AVX 512 - only thing I found was the following

    https://www.hpcwire.com/2017/06/29/reinders-avx-51...
  • Ian Cutress - Monday, July 30, 2018 - link

    I've got a few for our new suite. 3DPM has an AVX-512 mode now, and I've got the latest y-cruncher
  • JoeyJoJo123 - Monday, July 30, 2018 - link

    "AMD’s chiplet design will take a few generations to get used to"

    Is chiplet the silicon equivalent of calling someone a manlet? Lol.
  • jcc5169 - Monday, July 30, 2018 - link

    There they go again! More Intel Fanboy propaganda !!!
  • Ian Cutress - Monday, July 30, 2018 - link

    So a review of a product = fan boy? What? Last week I was told I was an AMD shill.
  • BurntMyBacon - Tuesday, July 31, 2018 - link

    CONFIRMED! Ian is a double agent. Now that his cover is blown, he must commence emergency extraction procedures and call in a body double.

    Or maybe people just get a little too upset when things don't go as expected ..... Nah, I like the double agent story better. You'll have to let us know what your call signs were.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now