Sparrow: An OS X IMAP Client for Gmail Usersby Andrew Cunningham on April 7, 2011 3:00 PM EST
If you’ve ever connected an IMAP email client like Apple Mail or Mozilla Thunderbird to Gmail, you know it can do a few weird things: Deleting an email from the client will usually remove it from the Inbox, but won’t actually delete it from the server – the email lives on in the All Mail folder instead of actually going away. IMAP clients also create and use their own Drafts, Trash, and Sent folders by default, instead of Gmail’s built-in folders. Because of this, drafts saved in the IMAP client can’t be edited in the Web client (and vice-versa) extraneous labels are created in the web client, and in general things just don’t mesh as smoothly as they should unless you know which settings to change in which client.
Enter Sparrow, which was built from the ground-up with Gmail users in mind – it shows threaded email conversations, it works around all of Gmail’s aforementioned idiosyncrasies, and it does so in an appealing minimalist package without any additional finessing or configuring. The 1.1 update even adds support for the Priority Inbox feature if you have it enabled.
Visually and functionally, Sparrow draws primarily from two things: the Twitter for Mac app, and the iOS mail client.
Sparrow displays all of your accounts vertically on the left-hand side of the app – to switch accounts, just click a different profile picture. Buttons are available for your main folders (Inbox, Sent, Drafts, Trash) and for basic functions (New message, Reply, Archive, Delete). Double clicking an email thread will open it up in a second window, where you can read all the messages, reply, and add or change labels.
If you want things to get even more compact, you can enable the “hide message preview” setting and fit even more messages into a given window.
If you hit the button in the bottom-right corner of the app, a message pane will slide out and you can view your emails without opening a second window. In this view, Sparrow is not much different from the iPad mail client in landscape mode.
You can star your messages as you normally would in Gmail, and your labels are denoted by small color-coded triangles. These triangles are pretty subtle and they don’t sync to the colors you have your labels set to in the web client, but if you’re a heavy label user you’ll probably get over these gripes.
Sparrow works best if you use Gmail without too many of the Google Labs add-ons enabled. People who rely heavily on, say, Multiple Inboxes or Undo Send (a personal favorite for so, so many reasons) may miss them in Sparrow.
Post Your CommentPlease log in or sign up to comment.
View All Comments
ciparis - Thursday, April 7, 2011 - linkI've been using it for a couple of weeks now -- finally, something I like better than GMail's ajax client. Thumbs-up.
EnzoFX - Thursday, April 7, 2011 - linkRecently just switched to this too, great minimalistic client. I did miss Mail's RSS capability, but now using Reeder for Mac, they are both simple and very functional.
CSMR - Thursday, April 7, 2011 - linkIMAP is obsolete, lacking even the features free email accounts have had for years.
Griswold - Saturday, April 9, 2011 - linkBullshit
vol7ron - Saturday, April 9, 2011 - linkDo you know what IMAP is?
CSMR - Saturday, April 9, 2011 - linkAn obsolete protocol for synchronizing email between clients and servers. One that does not does not integrate with contacts and calendaring, as is standard in modern email services including free services (gmail, hotmail, etc. using various protocols), and does not support push email, or integrate task management and delegation, meeting requests including room booking, presence, corporate directories, unified communications, etc., as the main professional service Microsoft exchange does.
10 years ago, when it's main competition was POP, one could be more positive.
Zoomer - Wednesday, April 13, 2011 - linkIt's not designed to do that.
I still find web mail clients painfully poor. Searching is god awful slow, response times can be slow, the need to wait for attachments to download (vs all preloaded locally), poor filtering rules, there is no support for quickly and easily editing From headers (as a per email type change), no easy and quick way to send messages out to hundreds of addresses at a go.
It also leaves you vulnerable to losing your data in case the provider shuts. More of a issue with the smaller ones, but it still has to be considered.
I could go on. But you get the idea.
CSMR - Tuesday, April 19, 2011 - linkYes free web email is not perfect, and a synchronized method is preferable for performance. You can get this even with free services (activesync, outlook connector, etc.).
The main thing for people who care about quality is that professional services are not that expensive. A hosted exchange account costs $7/month at 1&1 for example.
But maybe this is still too expensive, and harder to set up than hotmail/gmail, so not many people do this; maybe Microsoft needs to produce a limited version of exchange to cater to the "prosumer" market.
CSMR - Tuesday, April 19, 2011 - linkLooks like Office 365 will provide a cheaper professional email service as one of the options, which may be suitable for individuals also.
PubFiction - Thursday, April 7, 2011 - linkA random IMAP client?
Sorry this smells of payoffs or extreme bias an advertisement disguised as an article. If you are going to break precedent why would you do it on some niche use product like this. Also I agree with others in the day and age of everyone pushing for the cloud email clients make far less sense especially ones that are focused around a single free mail service.