As announced last week by TSMC, later this year the company is set to start high-volume manufacturing on its N3P fabrication process, and this will be the company's most advanced node for a while. Next year things will get a bit more interesting as TSMC will have two process technologies that could actually compete against each other when they enter high-volume manufacturing (HVM) in the second half of 2025.

Advertised PPA Improvements of New Process Technologies
Data announced during conference calls, events, press briefings and press releases
Compiled
by
AnandTech
TSMC
N3
vs
N5
N3E
vs
N5
N3P
vs
N3E
N3X
vs
N3P
N2
vs
N3E
N2P
vs
N3E
N2P
vs
N2
A16
vs
N2P
Power -25%
-30%
-34% -5%
-10%
-7%*** -25%
-30%
-30%
-40%
-5%
-10%
-15%
-20%
Performance +10%
+15%
+18% +5% +5%
Fmax @1.2V**
+10%
+15%
+15%
+20%
+5
+10%
+8%
+10%
Density* ? 1.3x 1.04x 1.10x*** 1.15x 1.15x ? 1.07x
1.10x
HVM Q4
2022
Q4
2023
H2
2024
H2
2025
H2
2025
H2
2026
H2
2026
H2
2026

*Chip density published by TSMC reflects 'mixed' chip density consisting of 50% logic, 30% SRAM, and 20% analog.
**At the same area. 
***At the same speed.

The production nodes are N3X (3nm-class, extreme performance-focused) as well as N2 (2nm-class). TSMC says that when compared to N3P, chips made on N3X can either lower power consumption by 7% at the same frequency by lowering Vdd from 1.0V to 0.9V, increase performance by 5% at the same area, or increase transistor density by around 10% at the same frequency. Meanwhile, the key advantage of N3X compared to predecessors is its maximum voltage of 1.2V, which is important for ultra-high-performance applications, such as desktop or datacenter GPUs.

TSMC's N2 will be TSMC's first production node to use gate-all-around (GAA) nanosheet transistors and this will significantly enhance its performance, power, and area (PPA) characteristics. When compared to N3E, semiconductors produced on N3 can cut their power consumption by 25% - 30% (at the same transistor count and frequency), increase their performance by 10% - 15% (at the same transistor count and power), and increase transistor density by 15% (at the same speed and power). 

While N2 will certainly be TSMC's undisputed champ when it comes to power consumption and transistor density, N3X could possibly challenge it when it comes to performance, especially at high voltages. For many customers N3X will also have a benefit of using proven FinFET transistors, so N2 will not be automatically the best of TSMC's nodes in the second half of 2025.

2026: N2P and A16

In the following year TSMC will again offer two nodes that are set to target generally similar smartphone and high-performance computing applications: N2P (performance-enhanced 2nm-class) and A16 (1.6nm-class with backside power delivery).

N2P is expected to deliver a 5% - 10% lower power (at the same speed and transistor count) or a 5% - 10% higher performance (at the same power and transistor count) compared to the original N2. Meanwhile, A16 is set to offer an up to 20% lower power (at the same speed and transistors), up to 10% higher performance (at the same power and transistors), and up to 10% higher transistor density compared to N2P. 

Keeping in mind that A16 features enhanced backside power delivery network, it will likely be the node of choice for performance-minded chip designers. But of course, it will be more expensive to use A16 because of the backside power delivery, which requires additional process steps.

Source: TSMC

POST A COMMENT

47 Comments

View All Comments

  • Dante Verizon - Friday, May 24, 2024 - link

    And the award for the most pointless comment of all time goes to... Yeah, You're clueless, guy. Machines are just one part of the equation, having them won't magically make the process better than the competition. Reply
  • Terry_Craig - Friday, May 24, 2024 - link

    They must be paid by intel. It's not possible for someone to be so layman. Reply
  • my_wing - Sunday, May 26, 2024 - link

    You must be paid by TSMC, just a couple of PR/IR slide, a couple of meaningless % of improvement, suddenly there are ** *** all over N3P, what that meant, why other node don't have ** ***

    It is intended to be look like this because the original comment also sound like a been paid by TSMC
    Reply
  • Terry_Craig - Monday, May 27, 2024 - link

    The company that beats intel with one hand behind its back doesn't need to pay anyone, the results speak for themselves. Reply
  • SanX - Wednesday, May 22, 2024 - link

    Where specifically lithography with say 3nm is needed if each transistor has *at least* whopping 40x40 nm in size on the surface (despite all interconnects are typically below it and helping to keep the overall size smaller) and even with 1.6nm will be still not substantially different? The numbers like 40x40nm to 50x50nm you get for 3-5nm technologies dividing the chip area by number of transistors Reply
  • nandnandnand - Wednesday, May 22, 2024 - link

    The "nm" labels are purely marketing names now, no need to overthink it.

    All that matters is those PPA numbers. Density has cratered but we're seeing nice power efficiency increases.
    Reply
  • name99 - Thursday, May 23, 2024 - link

    Oh wow! Do other people know this????
    Inform the presses.
    You have discovered a scandal that NO-ONE has realized in the past ten years!!!!
    Reply
  • lemurbutton - Thursday, May 23, 2024 - link

    Has density stopped scalling?

    7nm to 5nm = 1.8x density

    5nm to 3nm is only 1.3x density

    3nm to 2nm is only 1.15x

    2nm to 1.6nm (A16) is only 1.10x.

    That is a very very worrying trend.
    Reply
  • back2future - Thursday, May 23, 2024 - link

    [ diameter of a silicon atom is ~0.22-0.26nm, carbon atoms ~0.154nm, hydrogen atom ~0.1nm ] Reply
  • back2future - Thursday, May 23, 2024 - link

    [ and density progress mainly occurs within logic section (*Chip density published by TSMC reflects 'mixed' chip density consisting of 50% logic, 30% SRAM, and 20% analog.), means only about 50% of that area is highly optimizable with shrinking&density efforts (since SRAM and analog for peripherals have different requirements on distances for capacitors or higher voltage requirements, but 'What's the potential for density optimization on these area sections?') ? ] Reply

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now