Athlon64 3000+: 64-bit at Half the Price
by Wesley Fink on December 22, 2003 8:15 AM EST- Posted in
- CPUs
Basic Features: Athlon64 Processors
With so much speculation and confusion about the 3000+ Specifications, it seemed worthwhile to quickly review the features of the Athlon 64/FX/Opteron processors that are currently available.
Athlon64 Family — Specifications | ||||
Athlon64 3000+ | Athlon64 3200+ | Athlon64 FX51 | Opteron | |
Speed Rating | 3000+ | 3200+ | Unrated | Unrated |
Actual CPU Speed | 2.0Ghz | 2.0GHz | FX51 — 2.2GHz | x48 — 2.2GHz x46 — 2.0GHz x44 — 1.8GHz x42 — 1.6GHz x40 — 1.4GHz |
L1 Cache | 128k 64k Code Cache + 64k Data Cache |
128k 64k Code Cache + 64k Data Cache |
128k 64k Code Cache + 64k Data Cache |
128k 64k Code Cache + 64k Data Cache |
L2 Cache | 512kb | 1024kb | 1024kb | 1024kb |
Memory Type | Unbuffered DDR | Unbuffered DDR | Registered or Registered ECC DDR | Registered or Registered ECC DDR |
Memory Speed Supported | Up to DDR400 | Up to DDR400 | Up to DDR400 | Up to DDR400 on later models, Up to DDR333 on earlier models |
Maximum CPUs | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1xx — 1 2xx — 2 8xx — 8 |
On-Chip Memory Controller | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Hyper Transport Speed | Up to 1.6GHz (800MHz Clock) |
Up to 1.6GHz (800MHz Clock) |
Up to 1.6GHz (800MHz Clock) |
Up to 1.6GHz (800MHz Clock) |
75 Comments
View All Comments
morcegovermelho - Monday, December 22, 2003 - link
page 4 - Science Mark 2; page 5 - Aquamark; page 7 - Winstone 2004; Where are the 3.0Ghz P4 results?Why isn't the P4 2.8C included? It's in the same price range.
lifeguard1999 - Monday, December 22, 2003 - link
Interesting. The charts DO show up in both IE and Firebird when I click through the pages one-by-one, but not when I click the "Print this article" link (which is how I read the articles). Go figure. Thanks for the help Curt.Curt Oien - Monday, December 22, 2003 - link
I see charts with IElifeguard1999 - Monday, December 22, 2003 - link
This would be a nice article, but I do not see any charts in either IE or Mozilla Firebird. Is anyone else seeing this problem. or is it just me? Or is it that there are no benchmarking charts?sheh - Wednesday, August 10, 2016 - link
The article is missing the images, as of 8/2016.