Today, as part of Computex 2017, Qualcomm and Microsoft are joint announcing the next steps for their Windows on Snapdragon strategy. As previously reported, Qualcomm and Microsoft have collaborated to emulate x86 on the Snapdragon 835 SoCs such that Windows 10/ARM can now run x86 Windows applications, and this emulation has reached a point where it's ready for devices to come to market.

ASUS, HP and Lenovo will be the first OEMs to adopt the platform, which means we will see devices (laptops, clamshells, 2-in-1s) with the desktop version of Windows 10 but running on ARM. Qualcomm notes that the ubiquitous connectivity akin to smartphones is becoming an important aspect to how users use their computers as well as consume content – introducing the Snapdragon 835 on a productivity platform combined with the integrated Gigabit LTE baseband (Qualcomm’s X16) is a step in that direction along with mobile SoC levels of power draw.

When we first heard about Windows on Snapdragon, we instantly thought that Qualcomm and Microsoft would be going after the Chromebook market, but the announcement today is clear that both companies are going for something a bit more substantial along with all-day battery life. The official press release states that ‘Sleek, thin and fanless PCs running a Windows 10 experience’, with the 10nm SoC, sounds something more than a basic Chromebook.

One might suggest that the Snapdragon 835 is a premium SoC, and Qualcomm certainly wants to promote their hardware in high-end premium devices. With Snapdragon 835 in high-end smartphones, one of the elements Qualcomm is promoting is the fact that their SoC solution has a smaller PCB footprint: OEMs can use the extra space and weight for extra battery. This is part of the story which Qualcomm states allowing a ‘truly always on’ device such that updates can run in the background when the system is in sleep modes.

As part of the demonstrations on the Computex show floor, Qualcomm was showing Windows 10 being used with UWP applications but also some non-UWP apps being used, such as 7-zip. The OS element is something we’re likely to hear during Microsoft’s announcements during the week, which I feel might be a tipping point for these sorts of platforms. I’ve been using the MateBook X this week during Computex, and the battery life is actually fairly decent for an 1800 Euro ultraportable with a 15W CPU: but there’s still a small amount of battery anxiety for sure, especially during network use. Qualcomm’s value-add is their baseband experience, which they say is a big plus on this new platform.

Having a proper productivity device is a plus, but big questions still surround performance, especially when emulating x86. It’s a problem that has been tackled several times before without much success. The Qualcomm issue here is somewhat smaller than previous attempts, because as far as we understand it only has to target Windows 10, and they’ve worked directly with Microsoft in order to support it. Qualcomm and Microsoft say that this combination is now a solved problem with minimal overhead.

The carousel image at the top shows the S835 compared to a 14nm equivalent, showing the 'board space' savings of up to 30%. Qualcomm is keen to point out that a competitor's platform will need things like M.2 in order to add storage, which they say also take up board space compared to a Qualcomm solution.


As part of our briefing, Qualcomm showed off an example reference PCB design that might go into the devices that they are targeting. 

On the left is an Intel solution, and on the right is Qualcomm's S835 solution: 96.1cm2 compared to 50.4cm2 respectively. Here's a closer image of the Qualcomm solution (click through for high resolution):

The SoC is on the top right, with storage and memory to the left. It's worth noting on the far right is a USB Type-C connection, which would be the power input as well as how to connect other devices. There is no SIM card, because Qualcomm has integrated a multi-region eSIM which is activated at the time of purchase.

Comments Locked


View All Comments

  • Wolfpup - Thursday, June 8, 2017 - link

    So what I don't get is how is this possible, when Nvidia wasn't able to do x86 on it's CPUs? I mean I'm not sure now, but certainly when they came out they easily beat any ARM CPUs save for Apple's, and they seemed ideal for a Surface style mid-range tablet.
  • ViRGE - Wednesday, May 31, 2017 - link

    Two thoughts:

    1) Has anyone seriously complained about the size of a motherboard of a Windows laptop? Just look at the MacBook teardowns; these things are already tiny relative to everything else.

    2) Qualcomm's size example seems disingenuous. They're comparing Snapdragon 835 to what looks like a Kaby Lake-Y. Qualcomm wishes they had the CPU performance of an Intel Core CPU. Sure, 835 is half the size, and it's half the performance as well. Surely Apollo Lake would be a better example in terms of integration and performance.
  • mitcoes - Wednesday, May 31, 2017 - link

    Probably it will perform better with Chrome OS or GNU/Linux or even Android with a desktop launcher.
    I hope Qualcomm will not follow Nokia steps
  • Alexvrb - Wednesday, May 31, 2017 - link

    If they did that, it wouldn't run Win32 programs. Kind of negates the purpose.
  • mkozakewich - Friday, June 2, 2017 - link

    That's what dual-boot is for!
  • SydneyBlue120d - Wednesday, May 31, 2017 - link

    I wonder if we will get 64bit compatibilty with the Snapdragon 845?
  • Hurr Durr - Wednesday, May 31, 2017 - link

    It`s limited to 32bit not because of some hardware limitation, just like Atom wasn`t. In case of Atom it was product stratification, and here Qualcomm and MS are trying to stay clear from patent infringement case possibilities.
  • domboy - Wednesday, May 31, 2017 - link

    I'll be very interested to see what these devices are like. Though I'm still hoping we'll see a non-pro Surface running this, as that's what I'm most interested in. So glad that Microsoft is releasing a full Windows on ARM OS this time around.
  • BloodyBunnySlippers - Wednesday, May 31, 2017 - link

    "OEMs can use the extra space and weight for extra battery"
    Yes, but will they? Or will they just do what they do with phones and just go thinner?
  • Hurr Durr - Wednesday, May 31, 2017 - link

    Of course they will!

    I`d rather have a proper W10 phone with this SoC...

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now