Networking and Storage Performance

Networking and storage are two major aspects which influence our experience with any computing system. This section presents results from our evaluation of these aspects in the GIGABYTE GB-BNi7HG4-950. On the storage side, one option would be repetition of our strenuous SSD review tests on the drive(s) in the PC. Fortunately, to avoid that overkill, PCMark 8 has a storage bench where certain common workloads such as loading games and document processing are replayed on the target drive.

GIGABYTE had put in a 128GB M.2 SATA SSD (the Transcend MTS800 family) for the boot drive. This M.2 2280 SSD uses Micron 20nm MLC NAND with the Silicon Motion SM2246EN controller. Obviously, this is a budget SSD and not meant to light up the benchmark numbers. A WD Blue 1TB 5400 RPM drive also came pre-installed in our review cofiguration. Gamers on a budget usually prefer a high-capacity hard drive for installing games, and GIGABYTE has wisely put in support for it in the GB-BXi7HG4-950.

The storage benchmarking results are presented in two forms, one being a benchmark number and the other, a bandwidth figure. We ran the PCMark 8 storage bench on selected PCs and the results are presented below.

Futuremark PCMark 8 Storage Bench - Score

Futuremark PCMark 8 Storage Bench - Bandwidth

For most common consumer workloads, the PCMark 8 Storage Bench scores indicate that the benefit of going from a SATA SSD to a PCIe SSD is minimal. However, in terms of actual storage bandwidth, the NVMe SSD-based system in the list of compared PCs wins hands down.

On the networking side, we restricted ourselves to the evaluation of the WLAN component. Our standard test router is the Netgear R7000 Nighthawk configured with both 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz networks. The router is placed approximately 20 ft. away, separated by a drywall (as in a typical US building). A wired client with an Intel NIC is connected to the R7000 and serves as one endpoint for iperf evaluation. The PC under test is made to connect to either the 5 GHz (preferred) or 2.4 GHz SSID and iperf tests are conducted for both TCP and UDP transfers. It is ensured that the PC under test is the only wireless client for the Netgear R7000. We evaluate total throughput for up to 32 simultaneous TCP connections using iperf and present the highest number in the graph below.

Wi-Fi TCP Throughput

In the UDP case, we try to transfer data at the highest rate possible for which we get less than 1% packet loss.

Wi-Fi UDP Throughput (< 1% Packet Loss)

The GB-BNi7HG4-950 comes with a separate antenna that allows for flexible placement to get the best Wi-Fi reception. We placed the antenna on top of the chassis for this evaluation (as showin in the picture on the final page of this review). The benchmark numbers for this Intel AC8260 system in our WLAN testing are quite good, being bettered only by the Skull Canyon NUC (which also uses the AC8260). It is possible that the antenna placement can be tweaked to achieve numbers similar to the Skull Canyon NUC.

Gaming Notebooks Compared HTPC Credentials
Comments Locked

50 Comments

View All Comments

  • BrokenCrayons - Monday, October 31, 2016 - link

    Presumably it's in the hopper with the RX 470 and RX 460. AT already struck an Polaris deep dive off the list due to a lack of information, but there should be a GPU review or two coming in the future. Until then, a lot of other sites have already posted their 1050 review. AT's parent compay, Purch, also owns Tom's Hardware Guide and they have a pretty good review of the 1050 and the Ti variant.
  • powerarmour - Friday, October 28, 2016 - link

    $1000?, what a complete rip off.
  • 1_rick - Saturday, October 29, 2016 - link

    Nonsense. Miniaturization always costs more, and if for some reason you don't want a big tower case on your desk, this fits the bill quite nicely. The small size makes it portable too, if you feel the need to bring it places.
  • powerarmour - Saturday, October 29, 2016 - link

    Seriously, I could build a much more powerful Mini-ITX system for way less money.

    It's a complete joke.
  • Notmyusualid - Sunday, October 30, 2016 - link

    Miniaturization is a joke? Or costs no extra money, which is it?

    "I could build, I could build." Yeah well, get building, hand it over the Anand, and let us see how your review compares.

    Otherwise its just pipe dreams.
  • 1_rick - Sunday, October 30, 2016 - link

    Exactly. I bought a Skull Canyon NUC, and dropped a 500GB SSD and 16GB of RAM. It kicks butt at anything but high-res gaming. It's a huge step up over my work PC, so I even carry it in to the office most days and work on it instead of my work PC.

    With this Brix, I could game at lunch, too.
  • powerarmour - Monday, October 31, 2016 - link

    Well good for you and your underpowered soap box. For an extra 1cl, you can save half the price and have something that isn't out of MacWorld masturbation weekly.
  • 1_rick - Tuesday, November 1, 2016 - link

    If you think the Skull Canyon's underpowered, you're quite simply delusional.

    I can run two separate 6GB VMs with MSSQL apps simultaneously and still game. I mean, I'm not sure why I'd want to, but I can. Oh, but I don't meet Rando Calrissian's use case, so I'm an idiot.

    Sure thing, buddy, you've devastated me. I'll console myself with my paycheck.
  • powerarmour - Wednesday, November 2, 2016 - link

    Your definition of 'gaming' on an Intel IGP (even the Iris Pro) and mine live on completely different planets.
  • 1_rick - Thursday, November 3, 2016 - link

    I get that your entire "argument" such as it is, is "this doesn't meet *my* use case, therefore it's useless," but that's a stupid "argument".

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now