AMD Delays Ryzen 9000 Launch 1 to 2 Weeks Due to Chip Quality Issues
by Ryan Smith on July 24, 2024 6:00 PM EST- Posted in
- CPUs
- AMD
- Ryzen
- Zen 5
- Granite Ridge
- Ryzen 9000
AMD sends word this afternoon that the company is delaying the launch of their Ryzen 9000 series desktop processors. The first Zen 5 architecture-based desktop chips were slated to launch next week, on July 31st. But citing quality issues that are significant enough that AMD is even pulling back stock already sent to distributors, AMD is delaying the launch by one to two weeks. The Ryzen 9000 launch will now be a staggered launch, with the Ryzen 5 9600X and Ryzen 7 9700X launching on August 8th, while the Ryzen 9 9900X and flagship Ryzen 9 9950X will launch a week after that, on August 15th.
The exceptional announcement, officially coming from AMD’s SVP and GM of Computing and Graphics, Jack Huynh, is short and to the point. Ahead of the launch, AMD found that “the initial production units that were shipped to our channel partners did not meet our full quality expectations.” And, as a result, the company has needed to delay the launch in order to rectify the issue.
Meanwhile, because AMD had already distributed chips to their channel partners – distributors who then filter down to retailers and system builders – this is technically a recall as well, as AMD needs to pull back the first batch of chips and replace them with known good units. That AMD has to essentially take a do-over on initial chip distribution is ultimately what’s driving this delay; it takes the better part of a month to properly seed retailers for a desktop CPU launch with even modest chip volumes, so AMD has to push the launch out to give their supply chain time to catch up.
For the moment, there are no further details on what the quality issue with the first batch of chips is, how many are affected, or what any kind of fix may entail. Whatever the issue is, AMD is simply taking back all stock and replacing it with what they’re calling “fresh units.”
AMD Ryzen 9000 Series Processors Zen 5 Microarchitecture (Granite Ridge) |
||||||||
AnandTech | Cores / Threads |
Base Freq |
Turbo Freq |
L2 Cache |
L3 Cache |
Memory Support | TDP | Launch Date |
Ryzen 9 9950X | 16C/32T | 4.3GHz | 5.7GHz | 16 MB | 64 MB | DDR5-5600 | 170W | 08/15 |
Ryzen 9 9900X | 12C/24T | 4.4GHz | 5.6GHz | 12 MB | 64 MB | 120W | ||
Ryzen 7 9700X | 8C/16T | 3.8GHz | 5.5GHz | 8 MB | 32 MB | 65W | 08/08 | |
Ryzen 5 9600X | 6C/12T | 3.9GHz | 5.4GHz | 6 MB | 32 MB | 65W |
Importantly, however, this announcement is only for the Ryzen 9000 desktop processors, and not the Ryzen AI 300 mobile processors (Strix Point), which are still slated to launch next week. A mobile chip recall would be a much bigger issue (they’re in finished devices that would need significant labor to rework), but also, both the new desktop and mobile Ryzen processors are being made on the same TSMC N4 process node, and have significant overlap due to their shared use of the Zen 5 architecture. To be sure, mobile and desktop are very different dies, but it does strongly imply that whatever the issue is, it’s not a design flaw or a fabrication flaw in the silicon itself.
That AMD is able to re-stage the launch of the desktop Ryzen 9000 chips so quickly – on the order of a few weeks – further points to an issue much farther down the line. If indeed the issue isn’t at the silicon level, then that leaves packaging and testing as the next most likely culprit. Whether that means AMD’s packaging partners had some kind of issue assembling the multi-die chips, or if AMD found some other issue that warrants further checks remains to be seen. But it will definitely be interesting to eventually find out the backstory here. In particular I’m curious if AMD is being forced to throw out the first batch of Ryzen 9000 desktop chips entirely, or if they just need to send them through an additional round of QA to pull bad chips.
It’s also interesting here that AMD’s new launch schedule has essentially split the Ryzen 9000 stack in two. The company’s higher-end chips, which incorporate two CCDs, are delayed an additional week over the lower-end units with their single CCD. By their very nature, multi-CCD chips require more time to validate (there’s a whole additional die to test), but they also require more CCDs to assemble. So it’s a toss-up right now whether the additional week for the high-end chips is due to a supply bottleneck, or a chip testing bottleneck.
The silver lining to all of this, at least, is that AMD found the issue before any of the faulty chips made their ways into the hands of consumers. Though the need to re-stage the launch still throws a rather large wrench into marketing efforts of AMD and their partners, a post-launch recall would have been far more disastrous on multiple levels, not to mention that it would have given the company a significant black eye. Something that arch-rival Intel is getting to experience for themselves this week.
In any case, this will certainly go down as one of the more interesting AMD desktop chip launches – and the chips haven’t actually made it out the door yet. We’ll have more on the subject as further details are released. And look forward to chip reviews soon – just not on July 31st as originally planned.
-AMD SVP and GM of Computing and Graphics, Jack Huynh
36 Comments
View All Comments
kkilobyte - Thursday, July 25, 2024 - link
This is going to give the extra time needed for reviewers to re-review the Intel CPUs with the new settings.Unfortunately for Intel, it means they'll be shown in a less favourable light. How sad!
eloyard - Thursday, July 25, 2024 - link
But why would they do that?! They could just ship them, then gaslight the system integrators, mobo partners and customers, pretend it's a non-issue, then finally begrudgingly start addressing the underlying issues... /sKhanan - Thursday, July 25, 2024 - link
How the mighty have fallen. Oh wait, Intel was always like this. Nvmextide - Thursday, July 25, 2024 - link
Is there going to be a way to tell what chips are for sure the revised ones so that people can ensure they do not have the initial batch of faulty ones?GeoffreyA - Thursday, July 25, 2024 - link
If a silicon issue, hopefully the steppings will be noted, and then one can compare against that.haukionkannel - Thursday, July 25, 2024 - link
Two weeks is not enough for new stepping!This has to be something that does not need silicon changes if they just delay it two weeks…
flgt - Thursday, July 25, 2024 - link
Exactly, what exactly can you change in two weeks with the design and supply chain complexity of modern processors?dotjaz - Friday, July 26, 2024 - link
The amount of thermal paste. Minor curvature of the IHS. Possibly even fuse-off a core or a die, lower a grade.Many things can be done. And it's certainly not just two weeks. AMD hasn't provided any review samples, ypu think they are making the changes just now?
GeoffreyA - Friday, July 26, 2024 - link
You're right. Thanks for pointing that out.Iketh - Friday, July 26, 2024 - link
Nobody said they're making a change in 2 weeks. They're delaying 2 weeks for return shipping and re-shipping only. They could have made an adjustment months ago that is appearing in the second round of shipments. The second round of shipments are being expedited to the first.