Today Google is announcing its 2020 successor to its budget/mid-range line of phones in the form of the new Pixel 4a. Awaited since several months now, but seemingly delayed into August, the new Pixel 4a brings to the table a few key upgrades whilst offering a Google software experience at a $349 price point.

Last year’s Pixel 3a and Pixel 3a XL were seemingly well received devices, with Google’s strategy being mostly focused on offering a “Google Experience” software stack that’s only found on Pixel devices. This year, Google is trying to continue this focus with the Pixel 4a, with the biggest obvious change being that we’re not seeing a 4a XL being released at this point in time.

Google Pixel 4a
  Pixel 4a
SoC Snapdragon 730G

2x Kryo 470 (CA76) @ 2.2GHz
6x Kryo 470 (CA55) @ 1.8GHz

Adreno 618
DRAM 6GB LPDDR4X
Display 5.81" OLED
2340 x 1080 (19.5:9)
Size Height 144.0 mm
Width 69.4 mm
Depth 8.2 mm
Weight 143 grams
Battery Capacity 3140mAh
Wireless Charging -
Rear Cameras
Main 12.2MP 1.4µm Dual Pixel PDAF
f/1.7 77° lens with OIS
Telephoto -
Wide -
Extra -
Front Camera 8MP 1.12µm
f/2.0 84° lens; fixed focus
Storage 128GB UFS 2.1
I/O USB-C
3.5mm headphone jack
Wireless (local) 802.11ac Wave 2 Wi-Fi
Bluetooth 5.1 LE + NFC
Cellular Snapdragon X15 LTE
(Category 12/5)
DL = 600Mbps
3x20MHz CA, 256-QAM

UL = 150Mbps
2x20MHz CA, 64-QAM
Other Features Dual Speakers, 18W Fast Charging
Dual-SIM 1x nanoSIM + eSIM
Launch Price $349 / 349£ / 349€

Hardware-wise, the Pixel 4a is being powered by the Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SoC, a chip platform that’s nearly 1.5 years old by now. The SoC features two Cortex-A76 cores at 2.2GHz and six Cortex-A55 cores at 1.8GHz, accompanied by an Adreno 618 GPU.

Whilst certainly not a bad SoC in itself and is well fitting for a device of this price range, the fact that Google had opted to release a 4G device at this point in time, and versus new the competition such as 399€ Snapdragon 765 phones like the OnePlus Nord puts the Pixel 4a at a rough spot in terms of long-term value proposition. We’re currently at an inflection point between standards in the smartphone industry, so it’s definitely something I would consider if you’re planning to keep a device for more than a year.

Memory wise, Google has configured the Pixel 4a competitively as it features 6GB of RAM and 128GB of storage.

One of the best aspects of the Pixel 3a phones were that they feature OLED displays, and the 4a continues the trend for the higher-quality display technology even though the phones are at the lower price range. The screen diagonal has risen to 5.81”, however that’s only because the aspect ratio has been increased to 19.5:9 thanks to the move to a full-screen display design.

The 2340 x 1080 resolution screen now features a hole-punch front-camera located in the left corner of the notification area, actually representing Google’s most modern design aesthetic to date in this regard.

The phone has a similar form-factor as the Pixel 3a, actually shrinking in length from 151.3 to 144mm. The width which most notably is the defining factor into one-hand usability of a phone has remained similar at 69.4mm – which is actually on the smaller size compared to most other devices on the market right now.

The small size does have one disadvantage, and that’s the battery size which falls in at 3140mAh which isn’t all that competitive in the current landscape. The only silver lining here is that the phone weighs in at only 143g which makes it very lightweight, a lot having to do with the plastic housing of the phone that is actually quite uncommon to find in a phone nowadays.

The phone features up to 18W PD charging capability, however wireless charging was one of the features on the chopping block in order to achieve the lower price-point.

In terms of camera experience, it’s pretty straightforward for the Pixel 4a: It houses the very same module that is found on the Pixel 4. This means it’s again the same 12.2MP sensor coupled with a f/1.7 optical system at a conventional viewing angle of 77° which corresponds to a 27mm equivalent focal length.

The good news for the Pixel 4a is that at this price range, the phone should have an easy time to compete with most other phones as the camera is still amongst the best performers on the market. Whilst the main module is seemingly going to offer a great experience and will certainly be able to compete and probably outperforms phones such as the iPhone SE, it’s still only a single camera module setup – which is going to be again quite weird given that most other vendors at least have two usable camera modules, most of them opting for an ultra-wide-angle.

The front-camera also sees the adoption of the very same 8MP f/2.0 module that is found on the Pixel 4.

In essence, the camera performance of the Pixel 4a should be in line with the Pixel 4, for which you can read our comprehensive comparison in context of all other flagship devices in 2020.

Other notable mentions of the Pixel 4a is the fact that it continues to use a rear capacitive fingerprint reader, and luckily still maintains a 3.5mm headphone jack that’s no longer present on the higher-end Pixel phones.

A Lower Price at $349

The Pixel 4a comes at $349 which is $50 less than the launch price of the Pixel 3a last year. What we’re getting this year are a more notably updated processor, more RAM, double the default storage which has been upgraded to UFS 2.1, and a new design including a new screen with longer aspect ratio. Whilst the camera department has seen the adoption of the new modules from the Pixel 4, these weren’t that big of a jump over the Pixel 3 and 3a – and Google still keeps things very simplistic with only a single rear camera.

Overall, it feels like it’s a solid package, at least it feels a quite better value proposition than what the Pixel 3a was last year. However, Google’s only real strength here is the camera processing; a $50 more expensive OnePlus Nord offers a faster SoC with future-proof 5G connectivity, a 90Hz screen, and throws in the extra ultra-wide-angle camera, even though it’s possibly not great in quality.

It should be noted that the Pixel 4a has a petite stature, and the lack of a Pixel 4a XL means that if you’re looking for a small phone, the 4a is amongst only a few other rare offerings on the market right now.

I see Google having a tough time against the mid-range competition in global markets, the fact that there’s almost no other comparable device offering in the US makes the Pixel 4a a seemingly no-brainer choice at this price segment, with the phone offering a magnitude better value than the flagship Pixel 4 line-up.

Availability for the Pixel 4a starts August 20th in the US, with later release dates in other markets such as October 1st for the UK, and late-to-mid September for other European markets.

Google also made a teaser mention that we’ll be seeing a 5G variant of the Pixel 4a later this year at a price point of $499, which if the only upgrades are a 5G compatible SoC, will be quite uncompetitive in pricing.

Related Reading:

POST A COMMENT

154 Comments

View All Comments

  • TheinsanegamerN - Tuesday, August 4, 2020 - link

    Conservatives, give me a break. You euros use "conservatives" as an insult like the rioters in the US use "white supremacist" Reply
  • Spunjji - Wednesday, August 5, 2020 - link

    Speaking of cryptofascists, behold @TheinsanegamerN, who appears to be under the illusion that referring to civil rights protesters as "rioters" doesn't instantly mark him out as a racist authoritarian. The fact that you have a problem with white supremacists being correctly labelled as such is a bit of a giveaway as to where your own sympathies lie.

    That tripe about Hitler being "at all appearances a normal politician" is especially amusing in light of him having been imprisoned for attempting a fascist coup. He was popular because his party piggybacked on existing social divisions and used Jewish people as a universal scapegoat that transcended class boundaries. A sufficient proportion of ordinary Germans were okay with that.

    You can see the current equivalent in Trump's approval ratings: he uses white supremacist rhetoric, white supremacists openly support him, and at least 35% of your voting population is fine with that. Getting mad at people using accurate language to describe that is a sad little cope.
    Reply
  • Spunjji - Wednesday, August 5, 2020 - link

    Brexit was about getting idiots who think they love freedom to line up behind a fascist endeavour by puffing them up with reams of empty rhetoric.

    We're losing unfettered access to our largest market, desperately needed human rights oversight, and a whole bunch of other benefits besides. We are gaining *nothing*. Meanwhile our own unelected House of Lords is being pumped full of grifters, cronies and crypto-fascists, and the freedumb fanatics aren't doing a damned thing about it.
    Reply
  • asmian - Wednesday, August 5, 2020 - link

    Funny, but I don't believe most people would view Kate Hoey and Ken Clarke as "crypto-fascists". And the human rights oversight - is that the same law that was used to enable a corrupt lawyer to pay Iraqis to make false allegations against UK troops to defraud the UK taxpayer and discredit OK forces, who are probably one of the most humanitarian worldwide? There are good reasons we don't want to be subject to bad law made in a different jurisdiction - how many other sovereign countries would accept that?

    You're trolling of course. Or a remoaner who desperately needs to take his meds. Screaming about Brexit being a "fascist endeavour" is laughable. You've been watching too much Channel 4 News...
    Reply
  • Spunjji - Friday, August 7, 2020 - link

    @asmian Classic Brexiter. Cherry-pick a few bits of misrepresented evidence as part of a gish-gallop, then go straight to the ad-hominem attacks and furious projection. Nobody was screaming here, but if you want to talk laughable, you expect us to take you seriously despite proclaiming that anybody opposed to the monumental self-harm of Brexit "needs to take his meds". I don't think I've ever watched Channel 4 news in my life 🤣 Reply
  • asmian - Friday, August 7, 2020 - link

    Nobody is taking your hysterical tirade seriously. Better to cherry-pick some inconvenient truths to pull apart the utter nonsense in your unsubstantiatable claim that the motivation behind Brexit was fascistic, or that people were hoodwinked by fascists into voting for it. I thought people were afraid that it was the Russians who interfered to create Brexit, not fascists!

    Just because you don't like the result does not give you the right to broad-brush the motivations (or intelligence) of voters who didn't agree with your assessment of our EU situation and the likely outcome (insignificance on the world stage as an ever less democratic vassal of a Franco-German hegemony) going forward. Ultimately, the EU has always been a club run by the French and Germans in the national interest of the French (agriculture) and Germans (industry). James Dyson has confirmed that much EU law about product specifications is specifically made to favour German manufacturers at the expense of others - so much for "no state aid"! And as for democracy *within* the EU, you just have to look at the way the Commission and Central Bank treated the democratic decisions of the Greek people during their financial crisis to realise that they have no respect for that. Who would want to be part of a club that treats its members that way?

    Very arguably we are in a better democratic state than we were before, with our own judges now the highest authority interpreting the laws we are subject to, and our own MPs able to pass new British law that isn't just rubber-stamping decisions of the EU that may not be in British interests. If the new law isn't to our liking, then we will have the opportunity to vote out the government and replace it with one that promises to make better law, where we cannot do that with the EU commission. That's democracy - the antithesis of fascism.

    However unpalatable the wider economic ramifications of Brexit may turn out to be in your personal assessment, assuming a worst-case scenario in on-going negotiations that the EU has no good faith in concluding fairly, it is at core the very *opposite* of a "fascistic endeavour"! You have to be rather blinkered in your fanaticism not to see that.
    Reply
  • Operandi - Monday, August 3, 2020 - link

    Guys, WTF.... the Nexus 4 and 5 had wireless charging 5-6 years ago. Cars are coming with built in wireless charging built in.... What the hell are you doing? Reply
  • stanleyipkiss - Monday, August 3, 2020 - link

    Exactly. I will now purchase the Nord.
    No wireless charging -- no sale.
    Reply
  • drexnx - Monday, August 3, 2020 - link

    ...the Nord doesn't have wireless charging either? Reply
  • Quantumz0d - Tuesday, August 4, 2020 - link

    It's new Google, copy Apple is what they know. Remove features, make their devices look like shite. Run same SW restrictions like hardcore destruction of Android starting with Filesystem (Scoped Storage) and worst HW pricing with trash QC and worse nightmare for Custom ROMs, with 2 they had A/B slotting ruined TWRP and etc.. 3 had dynamic fused partitions, 4 has Read only. What a shit show Google has become.

    And add Politically Correct nonsense they brag on about. This Pixel division is going to shut down soon. They are losing money, that's why the devices are barely keeping up in price / hw ratio vs alternatives, esp in non US markets. In US Pixels has less marketshare than Huawei subsidiary, under 5%.

    The old era of Nexus is gone, not coming back. Very unfortunate.
    Reply

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now