Introduction and Setup Impressions

Over the last couple of years, mini-PCs in the ultra-compact form factor (UCFF) have emerged as one of the bright spots in the troubled PC market. Zotac is no stranger to this segment. Even though the Intel NUC is credited with kicstarting the UCFF trend, the Zotac nano xs units actually came to the market before them. With the nano xs, Zotac redefined the small form-factor (SFF) PC. The ZBOX C Series nano units were launched to cater to the demand for fanless mini-PCs. The nano series units use slightly bigger motherboards, but they are still small enough to mount discreetly behind monitors with the supplied VESA mounts.

Most of the mini-PC / UCFF PCs in the market are based on Intel CPUs. Interestingly, Zotac launched an AMD-based SKU with the C series - the Zotac ZBOX CA320 nano. Based on a Temash APU (originally meant for the tablet market), the product does stand out compared to the other alternatives at a similar price point (based on the Intel Bay Trail SoCs).

Traditionally, Zotac samples PLUS units for review, and the CA320 nano was no different. The ZBOX C Series is one of the few lineups for which a PLUS model makes sense - the bundled 2.5" drive is a SSD, and there is only one SO-DIMM slot. The fact that PLUS models come with only one memory stick is not an issue here. Other than being ready to go out of the box in terms of hardware, the unit does come barebones (no OS installed). The specifications of our Zotac ZBOX CA320 nano review configuration are summarized in the table below.

Zotac ZBOX CA320 nano Specifications
Processor AMD A6-1450
(4C/4T x 1.0 GHz, 28nm, 2MB L2, 8W TDP)
Memory 1x 4GB DDR3L-1600
Graphics AMD Radeon HD 8250
Disk Drive(s) FORESEE 64 GB 2.5" SSD
Networking 1x Gigabit Ethernet, 1x1 802.11ac/Bluetooth mPCIe
Audio Capable of 5.1/7.1 digital output with HD audio bitstreaming (HDMI)
Operating System Retail unit is barebones, but we installed Windows 8.1 Pro x64
Pricing (As configured) $270
Full Specifications Zotac ZBOX CA320 nano PLUS

The Zotac ZBOX CA320 nano kit doesn't come with any pre-installed OS, but does come with a CD and a read-only USB key containing the drivers. In any case, we ended up installing the latest drivers downloaded off Zotac's product support page. In addition to the main unit, the other components of the package include a 40 W (19V @ 2.1A) adapter, a US power cord, a VESA mount (along with the necessary screws), a single 2.4 GHz / 5 GHz antenna for the Wi-Fi feature, a driver CD / read-only USB key, user's manual and a quick-start guide. The unit is quite easy to open up (even without a screwdriver), but it is not necessary to do it unless one wants to replace either the memory or the disk drive.

The gallery below takes us around the hardware in the unit.

In the table below, we have an overview of the various systems that we are comparing the Zotac ZBOX CA320 nano against. Note that they may not belong to the same market segment. The relevant configuration details of the machines are provided so that readers have an understanding of why some benchmark numbers are skewed for or against the Zotac ZBOX CA320 nano when we come to those sections.

Comparative PC Configurations
Aspect Zotac ZBOX CA320 nano
CPU AMD A6-1450 AMD A6-1450
GPU AMD Radeon HD 8250 AMD Radeon HD 8250
RAM Crucial CT51264BF160B (Micron 8KTF51264HZ-1G6J1)
11-11-11-28 @ 1600 MHz
1x4 GB
Crucial CT51264BF160B (Micron 8KTF51264HZ-1G6J1)
11-11-11-28 @ 1600 MHz
1x4 GB
Storage FORESEE S600S064G
(64 GB; 2.5in SATA 6Gb/s; MLC)
FORESEE S600S064G
(64 GB; 2.5in SATA 6Gb/s; MLC)
Wi-Fi Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3160
(1x1 802.11ac - 433 Mbps)
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3160
(1x1 802.11ac - 433 Mbps)
Price (in USD, when built) $270 $270
Performance Metrics - I
POST A COMMENT

31 Comments

View All Comments

  • Mumrik - Wednesday, November 26, 2014 - link

    So what is the argument against building a NAS based on something like this instead of playing for a 4-bay QNAP/Synology product?

    It doesn't really seem more expensive, and the power efficiency looks decent.
    Reply
  • wintermute000 - Wednesday, November 26, 2014 - link

    how? you mean with USB (ugh)? Reply
  • Teknobug - Wednesday, November 26, 2014 - link

    Now why would I pick this over the other faness Zotac with i5 4210Y? Reply
  • CharonPDX - Wednesday, November 26, 2014 - link

    Because the Zotac costs twice as much?

    If this meets your needs, then this wins, hands down, purely on price. Obviously, there are many use cases where this fails miserably, and the more expensive Zotac becomes the better option.
    Reply
  • tential - Wednesday, November 26, 2014 - link

    The J1900 Zotac box seems to be a better fit. The review of it prices it close to this except they used a pricier SSD I believe. The box was priced at $170 and you can get RAM/SSD for $100 to match the price of this. And that Zotac box has better performance HTPC wise. Reply
  • duploxxx - Thursday, November 27, 2014 - link

    that J1900 zotax box fails at almost exactly the same HTPC levels. no 4K or 1080.60. SO turn the Q around, why would you always select the intel over the AMD knowing that in the end you screw yourself if there is no more competition.

    don't understand why today they bring a temash based solution.
    Reply
  • ultimatexbmc.com - Wednesday, November 26, 2014 - link

    Nice Reply
  • yannigr2 - Wednesday, November 26, 2014 - link

    Temash..... Temash? I have been waiting to see an AMD box like this and it comes with Temash? It's almost 2015. Where is Mullins? Reply
  • sonicmerlin - Wednesday, November 26, 2014 - link

    I wish someone would release a $100 Atom box that had a cable card slot. Reply
  • kgh00007 - Wednesday, November 26, 2014 - link

    Nice! Any chance you could get the CI320 with Windows 8.1 Bing?

    And will you be getting the Alienware Alpha in for review?
    Reply

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now