Today at their 2016 GPU Technology Conference, NVIDIA announced the first of their Pascal architecture powered Tesla cards, the Tesla P100. The P100 is the first major update to the Tesla HPC family since the launch of the first Kepler cards in late 2012, and represents a very sizable performance increase for the Tesla family thanks to the combination of the smaller 16nm manufacturing process and the Pascal architecture.

NVIDIA Tesla Family Specification Comparison
  Tesla P100 Tesla K80 Tesla K40 Tesla M40
Stream Processors 3584 2 x 2496 2880 3072
Core Clock 1328MHz 562MHz 745MHz 948MHz
Boost Clock(s) 1480MHz 875MHz 810MHz, 875MHz 1114MHz
Memory Clock 1.4Gbps HBM2 5Gbps GDDR5 6Gbps GDDR5 6Gbps GDDR5
Memory Bus Width 4096-bit 2 x 384-bit 384-bit 384-bit
Memory Bandwidth 720GB/sec 2 x 240GB/sec 288GB/sec 288GB/sec
VRAM 16GB 2 x 12GB 12GB 12GB
Half Precision 21.2 TFLOPS 8.74 TFLOPS 4.29 TFLOPS 6.8 TFLOPS
Single Precision 10.6 TFLOPS 8.74 TFLOPS 4.29 TFLOPS 6.8 TFLOPS
Double Precision 5.3 TFLOPS
(1/2 rate)
(1/3 rate)
(1/3 rate)
(1/32 rate)
GK210 GK110B GM200
Transistor Count 15.3B 2 x 7.1B(?) 7.1B 8B
TDP 300W 300W 235W 250W
Cooling N/A Passive Active/Passive Passive
Manufacturing Process TSMC 16nm FinFET TSMC 28nm TSMC 28nm TSMC 28nm
Architecture Pascal Kepler Kepler Maxwell 2

Powering the Tesla P100 is a partially disabled version of NVIDIA's new GP100 GPU, with 56 of 60 SMs enabled. GP100 is a whale of a GPU, measuring 610mm2 in die size on TSMC's 16nm FinFET process and composed of 15.3B transistors. It is remarkable in and of itself that NVIDIA and TSMC are in volume production of such a large 16nm die at this time, as everything else we've seen with a confirmed size is at best one-quarter of this size. GP100 is being produced on TSMC's Chip-On-Wafer-On-Substrate technology, with this line apparently being used for putting the GPU and HBM2 DRAM stacks on the same interposer.

We'll dive into the full Pascal architecture (as implemented by GP100) at a later time, but it's worth noting that Pascal here is 64 FP32 CUDA cores per SM, versus 128 on Maxwell. Each of those SMs also contains 32 FP64 CUDA cores - giving us the 1/2 rate for FP64 - and new to the Pascal architecture is the ability to pack 2 FP16 operations inside a single FP32 CUDA core under the right circumstances. With a boost clock of 1.48GHz, altogether Tesla P100 will offer 10.6 TFLOPS of FP32 performance or 5.3 TFLOPS of FP64 performance, more than doubling and tripling Tesla K40's rated throughput on these metrics respectively. NVIDIA has been happy to crow about the performance of Tesla P100, and for good reason, as this stands to be a very powerful processor.

Paired with the GP100 GPU on Tesla P100 is 16GB of HBM2 VRAM, laid out in 4 stacks for a 4096-bit memory bus. NVIDIA quotes P100 as offering 720GB/sec of memory bandwidth, which works out to a memory clock of 1.4Gbps. As we've seen with other HBM products, this marks a significant increase in memory bandwidth, more than doubling NVIDIA's last generation of cards.

In their announcement, NVIDIA also confirmed that Tesla P100 will support NVLink, with 4 NVLink controllers. Previously announced, NVLink will allow GPUs to connect to either each other or to supporting CPUs (OpenPOWER), offering a higher bandwidth cache coherent link than what PCIe 3 offers. This link will be important for NVIDIA for a number of reasons, as their scalability and unified memory plans are built around its functionality.

Speaking of functionality, Tesla P100 and the underlying GP100 GPU is a full-featured HPC GPU. It supports all of the HPC-centric functionality that the Tesla K20/40/80 embodied, including ECC memory protection for the register file, caches, and HBM2 DRAM. Coupled with the very high FP64 rate, and it's clear that this is the successor of the GK110/GK210 GPU.

NVIDIA's pictures also confirm that this is using their new mezzanine connector, with flat boards no longer on perpendicular cards. This is a very HPC-centric design (I'd expect to see plenty of PCIe cards in time as well), but again was previously announced and is well suited for the market NVIDIA is going after, where these cards will be installed in a manner very similar to LGA CPUs. The P100 is rated for a TDP of 300W, so the cooling requirements are a bit higher than last-generation cards, most of which were in the 230W-250W range.

Finally, in its initial implementation NVIDIA is focusing on customers that need extreme scaling capabilities, and I wouldn't be too surprised if this was in part due to the margins of that market and how these initial cards will be in demand. NVLink of course plays a big part here, with NVIDIA able to go up to 8-way configurations thanks to it.

Source: NVIDIA



View All Comments

  • Pinn - Tuesday, April 5, 2016 - link

    No, they don't do new chips to cripple FP64. They have other ways. Reply
  • ZeDestructor - Tuesday, April 5, 2016 - link

    None of the Titans are crippled. It's just that GM200 has very poor FP64 performance by design. Please get your facts straight and not spread misinformation? k? Reply
  • maxxbot - Tuesday, April 5, 2016 - link

    Titans are not crippled in FP64. The original Titan and Titan Black had full FP64, the Titan X was crippled in FP64 because Maxwell itself was crippled in FP64. Reply
  • ImSpartacus - Tuesday, April 5, 2016 - link

    Summit? I haven't heard that rumor. Where does "Summit" come from? Reply
  • ZeDestructor - Tuesday, April 5, 2016 - link

    More suppositino than rumour: Titan was named after the Titan supercomputer, and they may well call the next one Summit after the Summit supercomputer Reply
  • ImSpartacus - Wednesday, April 6, 2016 - link

    That's an interesting piece of speculation. I've been wondering where the Titan brand might go. Reply
  • extide - Wednesday, April 6, 2016 - link

    Yeah, that is pure speculation, on my part. Although it will probably not be until the Volta cards that we see the Summit name as the Summit supercomputer will be using Volta GPU's. The Titan supercomputer is built with Kepler GPU's so that's where the Titan name came from. Reply
  • Yojimbo - Tuesday, April 5, 2016 - link

    Looking at the configuration of this card, I'm wondering if a 1080Ti-type card based on it might not come out for a while, perhaps over a year. The 1080-type card will be based on a different chip (GP104?) and probably won't use HBM 2 at all (perhap it'll use GDDR5X?). I'm thinking HBM 2 might come to the GP104-type chip eventually, though, when NVIDIA replaces its Tesla M40 offering. I just wonder if the extra cost of HBM2 is worth it for desktop graphics at this point. But maybe it benefits mobile (notebooks) enough that they end up using it anyway? Reply
  • siriq - Tuesday, April 5, 2016 - link

    Will be rev 2 from pascal. Reply
  • Dribble - Tuesday, April 5, 2016 - link

    It would be a terrible consumer card in many ways, it barely has any more cores then the current 980Ti because it's full of floating point hardware that games don't need. Reply

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now